Forgive me if you find some conflicting data from post to posts. My intention is to provide food for thought, and as I learn new things, I may link it in or reference it, but not go back to earlier posts and make corrections. Thank you and enjoy.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Still pissed off

Someone sent me some info today. Thanks Mike123. I will repeat it here without editing and let you draw your own conclusions.

"
From this site…

http://www.irvingoil.com/company/erock.asp

go to this link…

http://www.irvingoil.com/dloads/Chapter07_Atmospheric.pdf

go to page 56…

notice that they outline the Proposed, (and environmentally fully approved) GHG emissions of the new refinery… 5.77Mt/yr ! and the Minister on Environment concluded


here… http://www.gnb.ca/0009/0377/0002/0036-e.pdf


3. CONCLUSION

Overall, based on the results of the environmental assessment, it is concluded

that with the proposed mitigation, monitoring and contingency planning, the

residual environmental effects of the Project are rated not significant,


#@$@#$% crooks" (I did edit the swear words)


Now go here and look at the total GHG for NB Power.

http://www.lowerratesnb.ca/downloads/Environmental_implications_En.pdf

Well, I will help you to reach your own conclusions. Basically, for NB Government to meet the 2012 Kyoto agreement on GHG emmisions, and allow the Irving Eider Refinery to be built, NB Power must be shutdown.
.
.
.
.

No comments:

Post a Comment